The evolution of this site has chronicled my journey into truth.  Like all of you who are reading my words–there was a day that I knew none of this.  As God led me from truth to truth, my paradigm of America was shattered.

One of my pivotal lessons was about the extensive bunker that most likely exists under the Denver International Airport, and the horrifying murals inside the airport–horrifying because of the interpretations that were given to them.  At first, I too accepted the interpretations, but then the Lord revealed to me what I believe to be the artist’s intent and message.  Nevertheless, I do believe the airport and the bunker play a part in the plan of ‘the elite’–whatever it may be.

The astounding thing, is that the elite seem to see themselves as having been appointed the task of governing the population of the world!  I believe most of them are so deeply deluded that they believe their plans are for good and that they are not only specially chosen and gifted for the task–but that they are truly people of good character.  (This is ludicrous, when you dig deeper and find out about their involvement with the theft of Geronimo’s skull and bones, with the Nazi concentration camps and chemical companies, and with the occult rituals they practice at Bohemian Grove.)

Another pivotal lesson, for me, concerned the events of 9/11.  What really stood out for me was the video clip of a BBC newscaster, standing in front of a window,  saying that WTC building 7 had fallen–while it was yet visible in the background!! It was another revelation of corruption in high places that really made me angry.  But the next lesson soon followed, and I don’t remember blogging much about 9/11–if anything.

(Here is a link to a well-reasoned interpretation of the BBC video clip and whether it proves or disproves either the official story or the ‘9/11 truther’ conspiracy claims.)

Today I happened across a video (below).  Apparently Geraldo Rivera has changed his mind about the 9/11 attacks. He is no longer dismissing the ‘9/11 truthers’. It was refreshing to see him post clips of what he had said previously, disparaging the ‘truthers’.  Hopefully he will really dig into this story, as he did in times past with others.

The second video provides more details concerning building 7, and it hints at some possible motives for staging a ‘terrorist attack’ on 9/11.

Larry Silverstein (real estate tycoon, 99 year lease-holder of the World Trade Center complex, and owner/builder of building 7) leased the complex from the Port Authority in the spring of 2001, and had $14 million dollars of his own money invested at the time of the ‘attack’.  His co-lessees Lloyd Goldman (not of Goldman Sachs) and Westfield America, Inc.  (Owner of a number of mega-malls, such as the Mall of America) had invested $111 million between them.  Bank loans financed $563 million.

Silverstein had (in the naive pre-9/11 days) been sure to see that his insurance policy on the WTC complex covered ‘acts of terrorism’. It is said that his bank lenders [General Motors Acceptance Corp./GMAC] required he obtain the coverage.  What foresight . . .

According to a New York Times Article from 9/27/01:

“Until those attacks, terrorism coverage was included along with other commercial coverage in the United States, at no extra charge, under the assumption that the chance of its ever being used was remote.”

So, I’ll say again–what tremendous foresight!

Because two separate planes hit the towers, Mr. Silverstein’s team made the case that they were two separate cases of terrorism and they were entitled to double the payout from the insurance companies. This would have amounted to over $7 billion.

But, contrary to the above video, the insurance payouts were capped at $4.577  billion.  Mr. Silverstein must continue to pay $102 million rent per year (until 2100), and is obligated to rebuild.  (The way things are going these days, it looks like ultimately Mr. Silverstein will be making his rent payments to China.)  An article in the Wall Street Journal on 9/11/08 makes the point that Silverstein and Goldman still needed to finance up to $2 billion to continue construction of the three new towers.

Was 9/11  a giant insurance scam perpetrated by a  few very wealthy men, as the video hints?

Was it a means for someone involved in a Securities and Exchange Commission  investigation to destroy their case files?

Was it a plot by the Bush administration and their global elite cronies to wrest liberty from the American people, as the most popular theory holds?

Was it a ploy aimed at shifting the financial burden of large-scale catastrophes from insurance companies to the government?

“The nation’s insurers have tried for several years to get the government to take on the highest costs in natural catastrophes like hurricanes and earthquakes. But today, Mr. Ferguson* said he felt the government had a greater obligation to help out with terrorism. ”After all,” he said, ”the basic duty of the government is to defend its citizens.””

Quoted from:  http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/27/business/a-nation-challenged-the-insurers-insurers-ask-help-to-survive-future-losses.html

*Chairman of General Re, one of the country’s largest insurers and a unit of Berkshire Hathaway

 

Or, in spite of all the seeming inconsistencies, was it a terrorist attack by Muslim fundamentalists?

Advertisements