Tag Archive: mandatory


Here is something to consider, about Obamacare (these provisions were in the prior plan, and I don’t see any reason they would not also be in this plan–no one seemed to have a problem with them):

  • This MANDATORY health care plan will involve every man, woman, and child in the US.
  • All of the personal, financial, and medical information for every man, woman, and child in the US can be kept in a file in this one system.
  • This system gives the government 24/7  access to your bank accounts.
  • Our friendly IRS will be responsible for all of this.
  • A national healthcare ID card will be required.

Here are some of MY OPINIONS, based on those facts:

  • It would be easy to monitor who had received vaccinations, and who had refused.
  • It would be simple to institute mandatory vaccinations.
  • It would be simple to require contraceptive injections for certain populations or individuals.
  • It would be simple to require any type of medication for anyone, as deemed necessary (Such as meds. for people who are diagnosed as schizophrenic, bipolar, psychotic, etc.; are obese, have high cholesterol, etc.)
  • It would be simple to calculate an individual’s ‘net worth to society’.
  • It would be very simple to revalue the currency.
  • We could quickly go to a cashless society.
  • Banks (except for a ‘National Bank’) could be eliminated.
  • You could be locked out of the financial system by opting out of the healthcare plan.
  • With all your personal  information in the system, every payment from the government (Social Security, SSI, welfare, foodstamps, tax refunds, etc.) could be routed through this system and direct deposited into your bank account.
  • With all your personal  information in the system, every payment due to the government (many mortgages, student loans, taxes, etc.) could be directly debited from your bank account.
  • If desired, your wages could be instantly garnished, your accounts could be easily frozen.
  • Legal judgments against you could be set up on automatic payment plans, without needing your consent.
  • Child support and alimony could automatically be transferred between parties, according to court orders.
  • If you won a case against someone in court, whatever they owe you could be set up to transfer to you automatically, according to whatever payment plan the court decided.
  • If you declared bankruptcy, the court could have payments made to your creditors automatically.
  • More personal information (DNA samples, eye scans, fingerprints) could, at some point, be a mandatory part of the plan.
  • The National Healthcare ID Card could become required for all financial transactions.
  • Until Radio Frequency chips were included in the cards, they could be used as a passcard in order to enter any kind of a business or government building, at tollbooths, when boarding airplanes, etc. thus ensuring our whereabouts were known most of the time.

SELLING POINTS THEY WOULD PROBABLY USE

Improved Health

  • Everyone would have access to healthcare.
  • Outbreaks of everything from food poisoning to plagues could be identified and tracked, and their origins determined.
  • If an outbreak began, it would be easier to determine who had been exposed,  and to quarantine all who are at risk of having been exposed.
  • Outbreaks could be prevented by enforcing mandatory vaccinations.
  • Abortions could be prevented by enforcing mandatory birth control until a certain age.

Efficiency and Savings

  • Financial, and other, transactions could be much more efficient if all of the information on each of us was in one location.
  • Your taxes could automatically be deducted from each paycheck and transaction, and eventually eliminate the need to file at the end of the year.
  • Businesses would save money by not having to deal with collecting sales tax or managing ‘payroll taxes’.
  • Welfare, foodstamps, etc. could be automatically and efficiently calculated, adjusted, and deposited.

A Fairer System

  • ‘The wealthy’ couldn’t hide assets anymore.
  • ‘Tax cheats’ couldn’t evade paying taxes.
  • It could eliminate welfare fraud.
  • No one could evade state tax by purchasing via the internet.
  • Financial losses (to the government, to businesses, etc.) could be greatly minimized because, once in place, payment plans could be adjusted (if necessary) during periods of economic hardship, etc. but debts would remain ‘on the books’ until every last penny was paid.
  • Stops could be put in place to prevent a person from spending or borrowing beyond their means, based on their financial history, and current income and obligations.
  • Priorities could be set on a person’s obligations so that payments were always deducted before any funds were made available to them.
  • ‘Deadbeat Dads’ could be stopped in their tracks by deducting child support from their paychecks and transferring it to the custodial parent–this would decrease the number of single parents and children that live in poverty.

Safety

  • With enough personal data (DNA, eye scans, fingerprints) included in the system, identity theft could be virtually eliminated.
  • It could greatly reduce crime.
  • It would be easy to monitor the whereabouts of criminals and catch perpetrators.
  • It would make illegal sales and purchases very difficult, and they would be easy to prosecute because every transaction would be recorded.
  • It would decrease theft, because it would be hard to resell the stolen items.
  • It would reduce robbery, and its associated violence, because cash could be eliminated.
  • It would be relatively simple to solve crimes, once everyone’s DNA, fingerprints, etc. were in the system.  (Even if an individual had managed to avoid that, it would be possible to narrow down their identity based on the similarity of their DNA to family members that were in the database.)

So, basically, my feeling is that the Healthcare Plan is a ‘Trojan Horse’ and a backdoor way of instituting a new system that is unconstitutional, and that many people would otherwise resist.

I know what sort of evil the Bible says that a system like this will enable.  It basically puts in place a vehicle for satan to come into power over all the governments and people of the Earth, and to have authority over everyone–and it is an awful, fearsome, brutal, stifling way in which he will rule.

Some people may think this is an exaggeration, that this system could not spread to the whole world.  I can’t predict the exact manner in which that would take place, or if it even would, but I do know that the American Empire is spread out over the entire planet.  Certainly not everyone is subject to us, but we have a significant entanglement with, and leverage over, many different countries and peoples.

We have sufficient bio warfare capabilities, for example, that we could covertly unleash a worldwide plague, and happen to be the only ones that were able to develop an antidote.  In that kind of a crisis, it would be easy to implement some form of a healthcare/tracking system in countries that we chose to help.

Who knows.  These are thoughts and opinions I have based on the basic facts stated above:

  • This MANDATORY health care plan will involve every man, woman, and child in the US.
  • All of the personal, financial, and medical information for every man, woman, and child in the US can be kept in a file in this one system.
  • This system gives the government 24/7  access to your bank accounts.
  • Our friendly IRS will be responsible for all of this.
  • A national healthcare ID card will be required.

Some people will see these possibilities as wonderful–others of us will see this kind of system as nightmarish and oppressive. These are just my opinions.  I could be all wrong.  I hope so.

And, as you can see, there are many compelling reasons to put a system like this in place.  Do we have a good reason for resisting?  I know it is unconstitutional–I believe that is a very important reason.  The opposition’s main rebuttal is that The Constitution was meant to bend and flow with time and circumstances.  (I disagree).  But, eventually it may not come down to a question of what our founders intended–but of what the majority want now.

How do we answer these selling points without sounding hopelessly steeped in superstition, fear and paranoia?  We are talking about things that can happen– but they’ll argue that it’s not inevitable that they will happen.  (Because of our faith in God and the accuracy of His Word, we know these things WILL eventually happen).

We are opposing people that believe the ends justify the means.  And it looks like the possible ends could solve an awful lot of problems–problems that are concrete and exist today, versus later events that they question, because they are based in the prophecies of a God they neither serve nor believe in.  I can understand why they would be so frustrated with our opposition.

Unquestionably, we are in a difficult position.  We know what God has told us things will be like later–and it will be possible because of a system they are putting in place today.  But, the only grounds we have for fighting it, that our opponents might consider rational, is that the way it is being put in place is unconstitutional.  Can we even say, with certainty, that God is telling us to fight it?

I don’t have the answers.  These are things I’m wrestling with.  What do we do?  Do we continue to fight it?  Or do we decide that if most Americans want this new Amerika, then that is their choice?  Do we leave, and find a home elsewhere, that better agrees with our beliefs?

If we stay, will we change anything by fighting? (We do know that the whole world will eventually end up with this kind of a system–but will it be because nothing we did could change it–or because we left and allowed it to happen? I think, at best, we can buy some time, but I believe we could buy 20 years at most.)

As Americans, it is our duty to fight this hijacking of our country–if we wish to continue to have it for our children, as it was originally founded.  But, if we find that we truly are in the minority–then do we have the right to impose our view of things on everyone else?

As Christians, we are to be good stewards, and to be responsible and actively involved in our communities and in our country–but are we to stay here and continue fighting, or should we go in peace?

I have believed that we should fight for America–especially since our government has basically been hijacked, and things that are being done are against the will of the people–but I’m no longer sure.  I’m beginning to doubt that enough of us have the will to fight–that some want this new Amerika, some don’t care, and some care but won’t expend any effort to join the fight.

Is taking back America something that you should be willing to fight for–to the death?  And if you believe so–why?  Is it patriotism that requires it, pride and anger over injustice, or the will of God for American Christians?

As Christians, what should our priorities be?  I believe:

  1. God
  2. Family
  3. Church
  4. Community/Country

I think each of us really needs to look to God for wisdom.  The door is still open, for those who wish to leave America in peace.  But I believe the door will close, and many of those who remain will be imprisoned or die for their resistance.

I believe that those who stay will either

  • yield and become part of the new ungodly Amerika (and be pressured further from God each day) or
  • stay, and live in peace as much as they can, and concentrate on evangelism (as a missionary in a foreign country) or
  • stay and fight to regain America–and pay a very high price (Will they win back America?  I don’t know.)

It is time to really seek God for wisdom, and His will in your life.  He has a plan for each of us, a plan for our families–and a plan for America.

Is America under God’s judgment?  If so, perhaps He is calling you to leave, so that you will not suffer her punishment.  If He is judging America, then would our efforts to win her back be in contradiction to His will?  Would we have any hope of success? If America is to be won back, it will definitely require God’s involvement to happen.

On the contrary, if it is God’s will for us to win America back, it doesn’t take a majority. Look back to the story of Gideon: God sent many of the fighters back home, and used just a small group of men to defeat a huge army–because He didn’t want them taking the credit for the victory.  He wanted them to realize that He had fought the battle on their behalf.

I don’t have the answers.  We each need to seek God for His will for us.  Some of us He may call to leave, some to stay and evangelize, and others to stay and resist.

And for those who decide to stay and fight–is it God’s will that your family should also stay, or does He wish to move them to a place of safety?  I do believe that your responsibility to care for and protect your family comes ahead of your responsibility to your country.  Do you have a right to endanger them because of your conviction that you should stay and fight? Even if that is God’s will for you, it may not be His will for them.

Let it be His will that decides your course–not fear, not guilt, not pressure from others.

There seems to me to be some kind of a spiritual law, that once you begin doing something voluntarily, it will eventually become mandatory–either by legislation, necessity or addiction.

It was great when a woman could go to work and the family could have some extra things–now it is a virtual necessity.  How many young women wish they had the opportunity to be stay-at-home moms?

How many smokers went for months, after they first began smoking, having only four cigarettes a day–until they got confident in believing they weren’t hooked, and then dropped their vigilance–only to have some stressful event push them over the line and, before they knew what had happened, they were smoking a pack a day?

Could it be that when we have the audacity to step beyond societal norms, eventually the shock wears off and it becomes ‘the new normal’? Society seems to have a kind of inertia, that a lot of energy is required to change anything–I guess that’s what they call the ‘status quo’ and people’s ‘comfort zone’.  Once things change, they rarely change back–at least not anytime soon.   I think the radicals that have hijacked America are banking on that–that the American people won’t have the energy, or the resolve, to put forth the  effort to overturn what they do, but will simply grow used to the ‘new normal’.  Maybe this is why so much was done so early in Obama’s term.

Obviously another strategy was used too: overwhelming the system–only in this case, it was overwhelming the people (mentally & emotionally) by throwing so many things at them in rapid succession.

Change, in and of itself, is stress provoking, but then they have ratcheted things up by throwing out accusations that are intended to provoke a strong emotional reaction and to divide people that otherwise might be able to work together to find a more reasonable common ground (than the extreme agenda they are determined to force upon us).

Even so, I don’t think they have been getting the degree of reaction that they are seeking–and I have gained a new sense of respect for the American people, when I see how they are (by and large) not taking the bait.  So, they have begun to resort to the kind of tactics used by a bratty kid sister:

  • do something and blame it on the other
  • provoke the other to do something and then run and tattle

You see, with all the bills they have passed, they are itching for the final step:  plug it in and light it up!  But, in order to ‘light up’ the new government they’ve created, they need a crisis.  If they can’t provoke enough civil unrest, perhaps they can open the door sufficiently to invite an attack from outside our borders.  Either way, they will keep poking and prodding until something finally happens, and then they will institute martial law.  After that, things will never be the same again.

I hope it doesn’t happen.  I hope we have time to make a difference at the polls in November, and in 2012–but don’t you think they’ll do all they can to see that that never happens?  You saw how much effort was put into ‘passing’ the healthcare agenda–do you think they’ll simply play by the rules and wait to see what happens with the election?  NO!!  These are pro-active people . . . who don’t play by the rules.  They are driven, and they are determined.

I hope we get to see another election, but November is a long ways off, and I won’t be surprised if we don’t.

I advise people not to form too much of a picture concerning The Mark of The Beast*, etc., because we don’t know exactly what it will be, and the Bible says that there will be such great deception in the last days that even God’s chosen are almost fooled. I thought I followed the same advice, yet I recently had my eyes opened to a different way that America might get to the place where we are all required to have that mark, and I was very surprised! So, even without meaning to, I guess I too had formed a general idea of how it would look, or happen.

It can easily be argued that speculation is a waste of time. What I ‘saw’ is just my own opinion of one way that it might come about, but I’m going to share it. I think it may be good for helping you to identify what perceptions you may already have, and to open your mind to a broader range of possibilities. (This won’t be nearly as far-fetched a scenario as it sounds.) I really wanted to write this piece months ago, but simply didn’t have the time. Perhaps it just wasn’t God’s timing.

I was very unsettled by some of the provisions that were found near the end of the first Obama Care bill. Surprisingly to me, little or nothing was said about them. Having in mind the cries of concern that are usually heard, whenever some measure to implement a mandatory national ID is considered, I was a little puzzled. I don’t know whether people that would care didn’t know what was in the bill, and the people who knew what was in the bill weren’t concerned–or if those who are watching out for ‘The Mark’ already had perceptions of how it would happen, that allowed this to slip by them.

I don’t know if these provisions are in the current legislation, but I have every reason to suspect that they are–especially since no one seems to have voiced any objections to their inclusion in the first bill.

Here are the issues that concern me because, when combined, they create the same kind of absolute control over each citizen that The ‘Beast System’ will have.

  • The government will have real-time access to EVERY individual’s finances.
  • A National ID Health Care card will be issued.
  • The government will have direct access to your bank accounts for electronic funds transfer, etc.
  • Medicaid eligibility will automatically be determined and eligible individuals will automatically be enrolled.
  • The officers and employees of the Health Care Administration (government) will have access to ALL Americans’ financial and personal records.
  • The government will build registries and data networks from your electronic medical records.
  • ‘The Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research’ will be established.
  • The government (Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research) may secure data directly from any department or agency of the United States, including your data.
  • Your published and unpublished data (public & private information) will be collected by ‘The Center’.
  • An “Appointed Clinical Perspective Advisory Panel” will advise ‘The Center’ and recommend policies that would allow for public access of data.
  • The bill proposes, for the sake of law enforcement, that the Secretary of Health & Human Services will give the Attorney General access to ALL medical data.
  • “Quality” measures shall be designed to profile you including your race, age, gender, place of residence, etc.
  • The government takes over the private payment system and all billing agents, clearinghouses, etc. are required to register.
  • The government will access all personal financial information of individuals it identifies as ‘likely to be ineligible’ for subsidies.
  • The government will MANDATE the establishment of a National Health Service Corps where doctors will perform mandatory healthcare for 2 years, for partial loan repayment. (All student loans are now to come through the Federal Government, if I remember correctly).
  • The government will establish a Public Health Workforce Corps, including a Regular and a Reserve Corps, to ensure an adequate supply of public health professionals. (I would assume that these Corps could be called upon to help ensure compliance with whatever measures the government might deem necessary–under the guise of public safety, a medical crisis, pandemic, etc.)

In reading back over this list, I notice that there are 3 different provisions that ensure that the government has access to everyone’s personal financial information, in addition to having direct access to everyone’s bank accounts. I can only theorize that this is a very important item to the bill’s authors (The Apollo Alliance?) that they want to ensure will not be removed from the bill, even if changes are made to one section or another.

So, let me summarize. If I understand correctly,

  • These provisions would link each individual’s financial records, bank accounts, personal records, physical and mental health records.
  • The government will have direct access to your bank accounts.
  • Your information will be available to just about every person in every department of the government, law enforcement, and everyone working for the healthcare system (oops, that’s redundant!), and maybe even the general public.
  • You will be issued a National ID Health Care card and, I’m assuming, all of your information would be contained on that card.
  • All of this would be mandatory.
  • There would be a complete network of government employed individuals in place to help ensure compliance with any measures the government calls for.

Am I misunderstanding? exaggerating? Does anyone else see the potential for big problems with this? In the end, I don’t think there’s anything that can be done to prevent this from coming, sooner or later. But, I think it’s coming soon folks. These provisions, if enacted, definitely provide a large part of the foundation and framework, for the American aspect, of the world government that will emerge, that will fulfill the prophecies regarding the ‘Beast’ government system (that will eventually be headed by the Antichrist)!

And wait, there’s more!

These are other provisions I find concerning:

  • The government will use groups (like ACORN & Americorps?) to sign up individuals for the healthcare plan.
  • The government MANDATES ‘Advance Care Planning’ consultations (mandatory consultation regarding your plans for death & dying).
  • The government MANDATES consultation with you to instruct you regarding living wills and durable powers of attorney.
  • The government will provide a list of ‘approved’ end of life resources, to guide you in the process of dying.
  • The government MANDATES a program for orders for life sustaining treatment.
  • The ‘Advance Care Planning’ consultations will be used frequently as your health deteriorates. (I’m having a vision of vultures hovering over you . . .)
  • The ‘Advance Care Planning’ consultation may include an ORDER, from the government, for your end of life plans.
  • The government will specify which doctors have the authority to write an order to end your life.
  • The government will decide what level of treatment you are allowed at the end of your life, according to preset methods.
  • ‘Community Based Home Medical Service’ means a nonprofit community-based or state-based organization. (Like Acorn?)
  • The government will cover Marriage and Family therapy.
  • The government will cover Mental Health Services, including defining, creating, and rationing those services.
  • The government will REQUIRE preventative services, including vaccines.
  • Nurse Home Visit Services will counsel you on increasing birth intervals between pregnancies. (Will they counsel in favor of abortions?)
  • The government will provide Nurse Home Visit Services, including determination of economic self-sufficiency, employment advancement and school-readiness.
  • The government will design and implement a Home Visitation Program for families with young kids, and families expecting kids. This Home Visitation Program includes teaching you how to parent.

There are other provisions to be concerned about, but these are the things that I see as the most immediate dangers to our freedom.

May I remind you–law enforcement (at present) does not have the right to come into your home and search it without a warrant. In general, anything obtained from or seen in your home, without a warrant, is inadmissible in court–UNLESS you open the door and permit them entry.

So, as it currently stands, you have the right to refuse anyone entry into your home. If any of these home visitation programs become mandatory, then you HAVE TO let them in. And if you let them in, does that mean anything they see in your home is admissible in court if charges are brought against you for any reason? Not that I have anything to hide, but what I’m getting at is this: is this just an ‘end run around’ your protection from warrantless searches? If so, how many people will realize that’s the case when they open the door to let the nurse (a government representative) come in? Is it even legal/constitutional for home visits to ever be mandatory?

One other thing-even though something you are doing today may not be illegal today, Obama has shown a willingness to pass laws that are retroactive. This means that if you have a Bible in your home today, and a nurse makes note of it in your file during a home visit, and then next month it becomes retroactively illegal to own a Bible, you could be prosecuted. Will you be profiled as a ‘government resistor’ or ‘terrorist’ if certain things are seen in your home and documented during a home visit?

If this new, proposed healthcare system doesn’t scare you–it should.

Will your eyes and fingerprints be scanned, your blood type noted, maybe your DNA be sampled, as part of the program? Is it too far fetched to think this could also be the precursor to a cashless economy? How much more work would be necessary for that to happen if all of your financial records and accounts are already accessible through this card? Could this card be replaced by a microchip and a visible mark, perhaps to prevent identity theft?

In regards to the focus on end of life counseling, (and of course) budgetary considerations, and valuations of life for different ages and categories of people (kind of like a credit rating?)–I have not even touched on the topic of eugenics or how the Nazi atrocities were connected with the American eugenics movement early in the last century.

In short, eugenics is the philosophy behind genocide and population control. It is a philosophy that is, and for some time has been, widely embraced among people in positions of influence and authority in America. (Some of the American families connected with Nazi experiments at Auschwitz and Monowitz are still prominent and influential in politics today.)

Frighteningly, also prominent today are the chemical/pharmaceutical companies that helped develop chemical weapons, pesticides, and medicines and tested them on the detainees at Auschwitz.

You may be surprised to learn that not only are these companies making the pesticides and medicines (and maybe chemical and bioweapons?) of today–they are among the architects of genetically modified foods/crops, and are the producers of many of our vaccines.

In fact, two of the modern corporations that bought out one of these German companies are receiving 60% of the funding to develop the H1N1 flu vaccine. I’m sure there is much more to be uncovered regarding these pharmaceutical companies, genetically modified foods, the possibility of mandatory vaccinations, possible vaccination-autism links, eugenics, etc..

Here is a link to the document that I referred to, with regards to the troublesome provisions of the first ObamaCare bill.  (It includes the references to the applicable sections of the bill.)  I want to emphasize, again, that this is not the current version of ObamaCare that is being debated.  It is the first version.  However, I strongly suspect that most, if not all, of these provisions will be included in the final bill.

http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=19319

*’The Mark of The Beast’: The visible mark used to identify citizens of the ‘Beast System’ (new, global, government in the physical realm that, in the spirit realm, is the kingdom of Satan).
‘He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name . . .’ (666-six hundred and sixty six). from the Biblical book of ‘Revelation’.

‘The Mark Of The Beast’: Characteristics

Are You Afraid? (forced vaccinations)

2010 Census Questions

If This Is True, We’d Better Not Yield To The Temptation

2010 Census Questions

I’m a little ashamed of myself.  I too got caught up a bit in the hysteria over the 2010 Census questions.  But, before you decide that this is where you ‘draw your line in the sand’, let me give it to you ‘in a nutshell’.

Here is a link to the proposed questions, as submitted to Congress in March 2007 (not during the Obama administration).  You can decide for yourself.:

2010 Census & ACS Survey

To summarize: Every 10 years the CENSUS is taken.  It is NOT mandatory that you participate.  The next will be taken in 2010, some time after April. Most of these questions have been asked for the last 200 years, and most people wouldn’t have a problem with them.

The part that people are upset about is the AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY.  This is now taken every year, with about 1 in 6 households being chosen to participate.  This IS mandatory, with fines up to $5,000 for not providing a truthful answer to the questions.  This is where the intrusive questions are asked.

At the above link you can see each question, along with an explanation of the date it was included in the census &/or survey and the reasons the question is being asked.

From what I could see, all of the questions were being asked to tailor existing social service programs and benefit levels to the needs of the individual community.  I happen to have familiarity with a number of these programs and can confirm that they depend on this information.

That being said, certainly the information could be used for other purposes.  It also requires trust to give up so much personal information and, frankly, this administration spent most of the public’s trust in its first 100 days.

Besides these questions being submitted to Congress, for approval, a year and a half before Obama was elected, another thing to note is that these questions are the same ones from the 2000 ‘long form’ census, with the exception of one that is being dropped (regarding military service) and 3 that are new:

  1. What type of health insurance do you have? (multiple choice)
  2. Marriage History: change of marital status in last 12 months?  How many times married?  Year of last marriage?
  3. Do you have a service-connected disability rating from the VA? (Veteran’s Administration)

I am not convinced of the rationale behind the Marriage History questions.  However, a ‘new HEALTHY MARRIAGE grant program’ is mentioned.  I can’t say I’ve heard of it myself, but I expect it is legitimate.  If so, then the questions might be justified.

So, as for me, I guess I won’t be exercising nonviolent civil disobedience, but will go ahead and answer the questions-except perhaps the new ones regarding marriage.

My main concern however, is the involvement of ACORN which is currently under investigation-and rightfully so, as it appears.  If I were to refuse to answer any questions, it would be because ACORN is conducting the survey.  I say, offer the job to the wonderful Senior Citizens that volunteer at the polls in my city.  With them asking the questions, I’d feel comfortable answering.

(In the past, when the 10 year Census was conducted, most people received the ‘short form’, but some received the ‘long form’ that asked additional questions.  A couple of changes have been made:

  • The census dropped the additional questions and now is only ‘short form’ and still is only every 10 years.  It is asked of everyone, and is voluntary, but not too intrusive.
  • The additional questions became the ‘American Community Survey’ which is now taken every year.  It is sent to approximately 1 in 6 households each year.  It is mandatory and seems fairly intrusive to many people-most of whom are hearing the questions for the first time.

If you are concerned, it is understandable in light of the current administration’s deceptions, manipulations, excessive pressure, contrived sense of urgency, usurpations of power, monumental intrusiveness, radical agenda, and trampling of our constitutional rights.  However, this may not be the ‘big deal’ some are making it out to be.)

Here is the viewpoint of someone who objects to the basic census questions, based on the principal that they are unconstitutional:  ‘Census Is For Counting Not Prying’ by Chuck Baldwin.  A case could definitely be made that we should not give the government ‘one inch’ more than the Constitution allows.

National Health Care ID Card . . . ‘The Mark Of The Beast’?

‘The Mark Of The Beast’: Characteristics

Are You Afraid? (forced vaccinations)

Is The Transformation To Communism Already Well Underway?